Keep the masters
The value of digital media lives in ownership. We work to retain control over the underlying rights, not just the royalty stream.
Streaming is not an addendum to the entertainment business; it is the center of modern cultural economics. For creators, influencers, and independent studios, the difference between a catalog that pays and a relationship that extracts comes down to the architecture of the contract. We read platform terms closely, negotiate master rights, and enforce your intellectual property — so the people who make the culture are the ones who keep its value over the long tail.
The economics live in the fine print: how revenue is defined, what is recoupable, who owns the masters, and what a platform's terms quietly take. By the time the money should arrive, those terms are fixed. The protection is won in the contract, before the work goes out.
Every engagement is composed against these commitments. They shape the protections we add, the questions we ask, and the document that leaves the file.
The value of digital media lives in ownership. We work to retain control over the underlying rights, not just the royalty stream.
Terms of service are designed to extract value from the creator. We draft the bespoke agreements that override standard terms.
When infringement occurs, delay erodes value. We move quickly — takedowns first, and litigation where it is warranted — to stop the unauthorized use.
These are the terms, structures, and practical risks that usually decide whether the work holds when the file is tested.
Negotiating 360 deals, licensing agreements, and distribution terms that keep intermediaries from diverting long-tail streaming revenue.
Structuring agreements that protect digital creators from unilateral algorithmic changes, one-sided terms of service, and sudden demonetization.
Rapid-response takedowns and, where warranted, litigation to defend creators against organized reputation attacks, copyright infringement, and digital piracy.
Each step is concrete; each step has a deliverable. The scope is defined, the matter moves, and the file closes.
We review your existing publishing deals, platform contracts, and royalty splits to identify revenue leaks.
We restructure upcoming deals to prioritize long-term ownership over short-term advances.
We set up monitoring and rapid-response procedures to catch and stop infringement early.
When terms are breached, we litigate with precision — pursuing damages and injunctive relief where the facts support them.
What stands behind the work — credentials and representative engagements, stated plainly.
Entertainment and digital-media matters are handled by Christopher Moyé, Esq., who authors the firm's published writing on creator and media law.
Creator and influencer agreements, platform and distribution terms, master and publishing rights, licensing, and IP enforcement.
We start from the revenue definitions and ownership terms — the clauses that decide what you actually keep — not the headline numbers.
Plain answers to the questions that come up most. If yours is not here, send the facts — we answer in writing.
Negotiate contracts that preserve your long-tail rights and defend your catalog against algorithmic extraction.
Begin a conversation