Ownership is written, not assumed
Assignment and IP-ownership provisions that put title where the deal intends — so commissioned code and contributions land with the party that paid for them.
The agreements that govern how software is sold, used, and integrated — SaaS subscriptions, end-user licenses, master service and reseller terms, and the open-source compliance underneath them. We draft and negotiate the ownership, warranty, indemnity, and use terms so the commercial deal and the IP both hold.
Most software disputes are written into the contract before anyone signs: an ownership clause that follows the wrong party, a warranty with no limit, an indemnity that runs one direction, or a copyleft dependency pulled in without a compliance review. The terms decide the exposure — and they are settled in the drafting, not the dispute.
Every engagement is composed against these commitments. They shape the protections we add, the questions we ask, and the document that leaves the file.
Assignment and IP-ownership provisions that put title where the deal intends — so commissioned code and contributions land with the party that paid for them.
Warranty, indemnity, and limitation-of-liability terms drafted as deliberate allocations of exposure, not boilerplate inherited from the other side's template.
A compliance review of the dependencies, so a copyleft obligation does not surface as an exposure after the product has shipped.
These are the terms, structures, and practical risks that usually decide whether the work holds when the file is tested.
IP-ownership and written-assignment provisions for commissioned development and contributions, so the enterprise holds title to the software it paid to create.
The warranty scope, indemnity direction, and liability caps that allocate who bears the cost of infringement, defects, or downtime — negotiated, not defaulted.
Review of the open-source components in the stack and the obligations they carry, so a copyleft license does not reach into proprietary code unexpectedly.
Each step is concrete; each step has a deliverable. The scope is defined, the matter moves, and the file closes.
We confirm how the software is delivered — licensed copy, hosted service, or reseller arrangement — and the commercial terms, so the agreement matches what is actually being sold.
We reduce the deal to a short summary settling ownership, warranty, indemnity, and use scope — the points that carry the risk — before the long-form draft.
We draft the agreement in enforceable terms and review the open-source dependencies, so the document and the underlying code obligations are consistent.
We negotiate the points that carry risk against the counterparty's redlines and prepare the agreement for signature, with the use, ownership, and indemnity terms settled.
What stands behind the work — credentials and representative engagements, stated plainly.
Software licensing matters are handled by Christopher Moyé, Esq., who authors the firm's published writing on intellectual property.
Software and SaaS agreements, end-user licenses, master service and reseller terms, IP ownership and assignment provisions, and open-source compliance review.
Every agreement starts from a short terms summary settling ownership, warranty, indemnity, and use scope before the long-form draft.
Plain answers to the questions that come up most. If yours is not here, send the facts — we answer in writing.
Bring the license you are negotiating, the SaaS terms you are standing up, or the open-source exposure you need cleared. We draft and negotiate the ownership, indemnity, and use terms that carry the commercial deal.
Begin a conversation